Greenfields U

Prototyping Cycles and Minimum Viable Products in Higher Education

Prototyping Cycles and Minimum Viable Products in Higher Education

In Part I of this blog post, we explored how one Research Insight on Strategic Innovation from research in the corporate research – distinguishing Discovery, Incubation and Acceleration activities and the corresponding organizational competencies – plays out differently in the context of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. In developing our two Strategic Innovation scenarios for higher education institutions, another major difference we noted was the challenge of rapid prototyping as an Incubation activity.

How do Competencies in Strategic Innovation Differ across Sectors?

How do Competencies in Strategic Innovation Differ across Sectors?

In our previous WiNCan posts on the Sustaining Strategic Innovation in Higher Education project, we described some of the insights from a series of research studies on strategic innovation in the corporate sector and our use of scenario prototypes to experiment with adaptation of those insights for strategic innovation in Higher Education teaching and learning.

Scenario Prototypes to Test the Adaptability of Insights on Innovation Across Sectors (part 1)

Scenario Prototypes to Test the Adaptability of Insights on Innovation Across Sectors (part 1)

As a sector, higher education is at the low end of innovation rankings. The challenges we face – demographic, technological, political, and pedagogical – will require sustained innovation at a strategic level. Most recently, Josh Kim recommended that higher education look outward for insights on strategic innovation: “Higher education will not figure out its future by only thinking about higher education. We need to look outside academia, and where possible, use these examples to think about our possible higher ed futures.”

To address these challenges by ‘disrupting ourselves’ in higher education, experts in teaching and learning have suggested that lessons learned in the corporate sector could be adapted to the context of higher education teaching and learning. Recent research with Fortune 100 companies in the U.S. has identified exemplars in strategic innovation amongst mature organizations who have institutionalized strategic innovation Beyond the Champion. As noted in our previous WINCan posts about this project, we are exploring whether – and how – we might adapt insights from this corporate sector research to improve and sustain strategic innovation in higher education teaching and learning.