academic-workplace collaboration

Leveraging a Diverse Academic Collaboration for Capability in Inclusive Workplace Innovation (part II)

Leveraging a Diverse Academic Collaboration for  Capability in Inclusive Workplace Innovation (part II)

In previous posts we summarized our rationale for engaging a diverse set of academic institutions to collaborate on developing capability in Inclusive Workplace Innovation. We also highlighted the international recognition for our initial collaboration via our European award for  Innovation and Entrepreneurship Teaching Excellence in September 2022.

This month our scholarly article on that initial collaboration was published in the open-access  European Journal of Workplace Innovation (Vol 8, Issue 1). The Editor’s introduction to the Issue highlights how  its contents reflect a wider diffusion of Workplace Innovation beyond its European origins:

Collaborating on Workplace Innovation Capability in ‘The Future of the B.A.’

Collaborating on Workplace Innovation Capability in ‘The Future of the B.A.’

Our course units in Faculties of Arts demonstrate the feasibility of enhancing B.A. programs to develop student capability for workplace innovation, extending other generic capabilities for employability currently being developed in those programs [Causevic 2022]. In this post, we address two issues about such B.A. program enhancements, as raised with us by postsecondary academic staff in B.A. programs which do not have a specialist vocational or professional focus (e.g., those labelled in Australia as a “generalist B.A.” [Gannaway & Sheppard 2019] and in North America as “Liberal Arts” programs).