Design Thinking: What’s It Good For?

Design Thinking: What’s It Good For?

I use design thinking, in fact IBM's version called IBM Design Thinking, in my work everyday on a very wide range of problem spaces and with a wide variety of organizations. I'm therefore often surprised by the limited view people have of the applicability of design thinking. Many people believe that it is only relevant to the user interface or the "look and feel" of an app or application. Nothing could be further from the truth. These people are essentially conflating and thereby confusing design and design thinking. I explained the difference between the two in my previous post.

Design vs Design Thinking Explained

Design vs Design Thinking Explained

WINCan workplace partner Karel Vrendenberg (IBM Canada) recently wrote an article with Sara Diamond (OCADU) entitled, "There's no innovation agenda without design thinking" which generated significant interest and discussion. One of the commenters wrote, in part, "...functional and aesthetic design is important but the technological innovation and the ability to implement the ideas are even more so. The kind of design the writers are speaking of acts as a discriminator if there are competing products but without the existence of a new product, does not come into play."

Preparing Graduates for Future Knowledge Practices

Preparing Graduates for Future Knowledge Practices

In this post, WINCan’s co-Principal Catalyst, Thomas Carey identifies a key challenge facing post-secondary institutions and their students “how can we better prepare graduates to engage with future learning and knowledge practices?” Through discussions with other higher ed professionals, a solution emerged: “let’s treat our teaching and learning environments as model workplaces, full of experiential learning opportunities for reflective practice on changing knowledge work, practices and roles.”